Ok, it is 1 thing to say
Spa X was busted, and the heat is on in an area, but
he specifically said it was closed for human trafficing, and gave the details of the article for 1 location.
Maybe it is me, but I read that as
he is taking some kind of moral issue with it and as such posted 3 times on 3 spas, which may or may actually be involved in human trafficing.
He kind of lumped them all togehter as to say if 1 is doing it they are all doing it. The other types of busts (you know services for money types) are not mentioned. But to link the same text under 3
spa names LEADS people to believe all 3 spas were trafficing girls, and if there is no evidence of that at 2 of the spas
he posted under, it will kill business. I personally do not want to visit the spas where the girls are forced, locked in and receive little to none of the money. So his associating the other 2 spas with human trafficing can impact their business.